Evaluation of the biological quality of soil in citrus systems using Pfeiffer chromatography

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5377/wani.v1i84.22363

Keywords:

Agricultural biology, soil fertility, organic matter, ecology, plant physiology, plant nutrition

Abstract

This study implemented Pfeiffer chromatography for the analysis of the biological soil quality of areas cultivated with Tahiti lime (Citrus latifolia) in Estelí, Nicaragua by applying agroecological and conventional management. Using a pre- and post-treatment evaluation design, chromas were performed per plot, and morphological patterns were described such as (radial gradient, halo homogeneity, branching, dark precipitates, and center–edge chromatic transition). As a basis, physicochemical analyses were incorporated (organic matter, available phosphorus, cation exchange capacity, and bases) and, as support, eco-physiological measurements in plants (SPAD, pH and °Brix in sap, nutrient concentration, foliar moisture) and productive variables (fruit weight, diameter, and length). The chromas showed greater biological stability in agroecological management (well-defined concentric rings, continuous transition, and smaller precipitate zones), correlated with lower bulk density, higher infiltration, adequate pH and better nutrient use efficiency. Conventional management showed higher levels of organic matter, fruits with greater diameter and weight, with signs of salinization and lower physiological efficiency. The °Brix in sap varied by batch (agroecological higher in one; conventional in another). Chromatography allowed for clear differentiation of the management types and evidenced variations in the process on the biological quality of the soil. The results, when correlated with the rest of the analyses, matched the trends observed in physical and physiological properties, indicating that it is a practical, visual, and economical qualitative tool that complements chemical analyses in agriculture.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
6
PDF (Español (España)) 1

References

Altieri, M. A., & Nicholls, C. I. (2018). Agroecología: Ciencia y política. SOCLA, Icaria. https://www.socla.coop/publicaciones/libros/agroecologia-ciencia-y-politica/

Bünemann, E. K., Bongiorno, G., Bai, Z., Creamer, R. E., De Deyn, G., de Goede, R., Fleskens, L., Geissen, V., Kuyper, T. W., Mäder, P., Pulleman, M., Sukkel, W., van Groenigen, J. W., & Brussaard, L. (2018). Soil quality – A critical review. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 120, 105–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.01.030

Cai, Q., Liu, J., Li, X., Sun, J., & Yang, R. (2024). Effects of nutritional stress on soil fertility and antioxidant enzyme activities in rice. Frontiers in Plant Science, 15, 1471682. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2024.1471682

Cercado Quiñonez, E. A. (2021). Evaluación cualitativa de suelos de la parroquia Colonche mediante cromatografía de Pfeiffer [Trabajo de integración curricular, Universidad Estatal Península de Santa Elena]. Universidad Estatal Península de Santa Elena. https://repositorio.upse.edu.ec/server/api/core/bitstreams/bb194e68-ea63-41ea-8387-9495d310eec4/content

FAO. (2017). Voluntary Guidelines for Sustainable Soil Management. Recuperado el 10 de diciembre de 2025, de https://openknowledge.fao.org/handle/20.500.14283/I8894EN

FAO & ITPS. (2021). Global status of salt-affected soils. https://openknowledge.fao.org/handle/20.500.14283/I8894EN

Google. (2025). Google Maps . Recuperado el 10 de diciembre de 2025, de https://maps.google.com

Hocking, B., Tyerman, S. D., Burton, R. A., & Gilliham, M. (2016). Fruit calcium: Transport and physiology. Frontiers in Plant Science, 7, 569. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00569

Horton, D. (2022). Home fruit orchard pruning techniques (Circular C 1087). University of Georgia Cooperative Extension. https://fieldreport.caes.uga.edu/publications/C1087/home-fruit-orchard-pruning-techniques/

Intergovernmental Technical Panel on Soils & Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2022). The status of the world’s soil resources: Technical summary update 2022. https://www.fao.org/3/cb9910en/cb9910en.pdf

Karaca, A., Cetin, S. C., Turgay, O. C., & Kizilkaya, R. (2010). Shukla & A. Varma (Eds.), Soil enzymology (pp. 119–148). Springer.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14225-3_7

Lal, R. (2020). Soil organic matter content and crop yield. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 75(2), 27A–32A. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.75.2.27A

Marschner, P. (2012). Marschner’s mineral nutrition of higher plants (3rd ed.). Elsevier / Academic Press. https://www.sciencedirect.com/book/9780123849052

Nicholls, C. I., & Altieri, M. A. (2019). Bases agroecológicas para la adaptación de la agricultura al cambio climático. Cuadernos de Investigación UNED, 11(1), S55–S61. https://www.scielo.sa.cr/pdf/cinn/v11n1/1659-4266-cinn-11-01-55.pdf

Pfeiffer, E. E. (1984). Chromatography applied to quality testing (4th ed.). Biodynamic Farming & Gardening Association. https://steinerbooks.org/products/9780938250210-chromatography-applied-to-quality-testing

Pilon, L. C., Cardoso, J. H., & Medeiros, F. S. (2018). Guia prático de cromatografia de Pfeiffer (Documentos 455). Embrapa Clima Temperado. https://www.infoteca.cnptia.embrapa.br/handle/doc/1097113

Reganold, J. P., & Wachter, J. M. (2016). Organic agriculture in the twenty-first century. Nature Plants, 2(1), 15221. https://doi.org/10.1038/nplants.2015.221

Restrepo Rivera, J. (2021). Manual práctico de agricultura regenerativa. Fundación Agricultura Regenerativa Latinoamérica.

Restrepo Rivera, J., & Pinheiro, S. (2011). Cromatografía: Imágenes de vida y destrucción del suelo. Impresora Feriva. https://morralcampesino.files.wordpress.com/2016/03/cromatografia-restrepo-pinheiro.pdf

Soiltech Solutions. (2018). Guía técnica para la interpretación de cromas de Pfeiffer. Soiltech Solutions.

Taiz, L., Zeiger, E., Møller, I. M., & Murphy, A. (2015). Plant physiology and development (6th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Trasar-Cepeda, C., Leirós, M. C., & Gil-Sotres, F. (2008). Hydrolytic enzyme activities in agricultural and forest soils: Some implications for their use as indicators of soil quality. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 40(10), 2146–2155.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.03.015

Tripathi, R., Tewari, R., Singh, K. P., Keswani, C., Minkina, T., Srivastava, A. K., De Corato, U., & Sansinenea, E. (2022). Plant mineral nutrition and disease resistance: A significant connection. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, Article 883970. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.883970

Universidad de Buenos Aires. (2023). Biodiversidad del suelo: funciones ecológicas y relevancia ambiental. https://www.uba.ar

Weather Atlas. (2025). Estelí, Nicaragua — clima y tiempo. Recuperado el 10 de diciembre de 2025, de https://www.weather-atlas.com/en/nicaragua/esteli

White, P. J., & Broadley, M. R. (2003). Calcium in plants. Annals of Botany, 92(4), 487–511. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcg164

Published

2026-03-24

How to Cite

Monzón Talavera, J. J., & Matey Fajardo, D. G. (2026). Evaluation of the biological quality of soil in citrus systems using Pfeiffer chromatography. Wani, (84). https://doi.org/10.5377/wani.v1i84.22363

Issue

Section

Natural Resources and Environment

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.